Participants in the NAP Dialogue pose for a group photo. |
Climate change is a national mayhem
with area specific effects i.e. increased influx of pests and diseases,
flooding especially in the low land areas of Teso, soil erosion and landslides
in the hilly areas of Mbale, Bundibugyo and Kasese causing tremendous loss of
lives and property. The effects of climate change have affected planning and
budgeting of the country as they lead to double doing of activities especially
during construction and planting which retards the realization set national
development targets. Uganda is committed to the pursuit of climate resilient
and low carbon emissions with the ongoing impact assessment of the level of
vulnerability of Ugandans to climate change, and implementation of some of the
National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPA) priorities, however these efforts are
being influenced by a number of challenges many of which need collective
efforts to be addressed.
During the National Adaptation Planning
Dialogue held on 8th/06/2016 at Imperial Royale Hotel organized by
ACODE, Action Aid and EMLI Bwaise Facility in collaboration with the Ministry
of water and Environment, limited quality and quantity of data to assess the
vulnerability of Ugandans to climate change was mentioned as one of the
challenges to adaptation where there is scanty information regarding the
vulnerability levels of Ugandans which affects the level of planning.
Mr Chebet Maikut, commissioner, Climate
Change Department, Ministry of Water and Environment said that despite the USD
8.37 million from the least development fund and $ 4 million that is to support
Uganda to build resilience on water supply and sanitation there is still inadequate
capacity to mobilize and use resources for adaptation.
In addition, the inadequate ability by institutions
to integrate climate change issues in to development plans i.e. district plans has
affected the level of implementing national development plans. According to
Aaron Werikhe, NPA, only 30% of the priorities in the NDP 1 was implemented due
to lack of sector development plans that are in line with NDP and the limited
coherence in the budget process. He said that planning and financing
communicate to each other and failure to achieve the coherence affects the realization of the set developmental goals.
Despite the challenges, there is still
hope for Uganda to adapt effectively to climate change if only; the government
stops reliance on donor funds and think of local initiatives that can deepen
financing, Uganda Revenue Authority strengthens its work of collecting more
domestic revenue to cater for climate
change financing and strengthen coordination in institutions.
Possible and environmental level
polluters should begin to pay revenue to the government that can be used to
tackle climate change issues.
Agriculture being the sector most prone
to climate change impacts, adaptive agriculture programmes should be put in
place for example countries should embrace climate smart agriculture through
increasing financing in the sector.
Fund climate resilient infrastructures,
in Uganda a number of roads and bridges are being affected by the heavy rains
which leave most of them flooded and others broken, therefore funding climate
resilient infrastructures will help to reduce government spending on
infrastructures in the long run.
A lot is required to address climate
change impacts but more is needed to build capacity among Ugandans specifically
in resource mobilization, integration of climate change issues in sector plans
and strengthen coordination among institutions towards a common cause if the
development targets are to be realized.
No comments:
Post a Comment